<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jesus Hates Papyrus &#187; porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesushatespapyrus.com/tag/porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com</link>
	<description>helping the church become the most creative place on the planet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reason #714 to drop IE : Porn mode</title>
		<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/online/reason-714-to-drop-ie-porn-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/online/reason-714-to-drop-ie-porn-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckingham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesushatespapyrus.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, maybe there aren&#8217;t really 713 reasons to not use IE&#8230;but there are a number of them. The number one reason is: Firefox is just better. The number two reason: IE is a pain to develop for and now Microsoft&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://jesushatespapyrus.com/images/firefoxVSexplorer.jpg" class="left" alt="firefox VS explorer" />Okay, maybe there aren&#8217;t really 713 reasons to not use IE&#8230;but there are a number of them. The number one reason is: Firefox is just better. The number two reason: IE is a pain to develop for and now Microsoft gives us a new reason: Porn mode.</p>
<p>Fox news <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,412161,00.html">reports</a> that Microsoft’s latest Internet browser includes a piece of software that allows Internet users to hide the audit trail of websites they have visited.</p>
<p>The InPrivate feature on Internet Explorer 8, nicknamed “porn mode”, allows users to conceal the sites they have viewed at the click of a button.</p>
<p>Granted, you can do the same thing in every browser&#8230;but they&#8217;re highlighting it and giving it a special button&#8230;and it&#8217;s a good excuse to get all churches moved over to Firefox and then every developer has one less browser to test for. Win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/online/reason-714-to-drop-ie-porn-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there such a thing as going to far?</title>
		<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/</link>
		<comments>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckingham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot glass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesushatespapyrus.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I love <a href="http://holycowablog.com/?p=50">originality</a>.  Sadly we have a severe lack of creativity in the church today. We copy the church down the street, rip off the latest TV show and we even are even preaching the same exact stock messages.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love <a href="http://holycowablog.com/?p=50">originality</a>.  Sadly we have a severe lack of creativity in the church today. We copy the church down the street, rip off the latest TV show and we even are even preaching the same exact stock messages. All of those things can be great springboards, but only if you allow them to stir your creativity and do the hard work of developing original ideas from them.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.holycowcreative.org/images/ohgod.jpg" class="right" alt="oh god billboard" />We&#8217;ve worked with churches and put sermon branding on race cars, sent people out to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/holycowcreative/1205066992/">scrape the ice</a>  off of people&#8217;s cars, and even taped people&#8217;s <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/holycowcreative/2208886137/">mouth shut</a>&#8230;but is there such a thing as going to far? Are we pushing the envelope to communicate more effectively or for the simple effect of shock and awe?</p>
<p>What about that billboard, it&#8217;s funny and I&#8217;d laugh as I drove by, but is it too much?</p>
<p> <img src="http://www.holycowcreative.org/images/shotglass.jpg" class="right" alt="shot glass" />Or how about a <a href="http://nextlevelchurchnc.blogspot.com/2008/01/give-us-shot.html">shot glass with a church logo</a> on it, is that going to far and giving a green light to the activity?</p>
<p>What about <a href="http://xxxchurch.com/">XXXchurch</a>? They&#8217;ve made a big splash in porn but can they go too far?<img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:UCDdjcT5DUtFHM:http://www.anotherthink.com/my_graphics/JLPS.jpg" class="left" alt="xxx" /></p>
<p>What do you think? How much is too much in bringing originality to the church? Is there such a thing? Can you go too far to reach people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.264 seconds -->

