<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jesus Hates Papyrus &#187; ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesushatespapyrus.com/tag/ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com</link>
	<description>helping the church become the most creative place on the planet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is there such a thing as going to far?</title>
		<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/</link>
		<comments>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckingham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot glass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesushatespapyrus.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love originality. Sadly we have a severe lack of creativity in the church today. We copy the church down the street, rip off the latest TV show and we even are even preaching the same exact stock messages. All of those things can be great springboards, but only if you allow them to stir [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love <a href="http://holycowablog.com/?p=50">originality</a>.  Sadly we have a severe lack of creativity in the church today. We copy the church down the street, rip off the latest TV show and we even are even preaching the same exact stock messages. All of those things can be great springboards, but only if you allow them to stir your creativity and do the hard work of developing original ideas from them.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.holycowcreative.org/images/ohgod.jpg" class="right" alt="oh god billboard" />We&#8217;ve worked with churches and put sermon branding on race cars, sent people out to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/holycowcreative/1205066992/">scrape the ice</a>  off of people&#8217;s cars, and even taped people&#8217;s <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/holycowcreative/2208886137/">mouth shut</a>&#8230;but is there such a thing as going to far? Are we pushing the envelope to communicate more effectively or for the simple effect of shock and awe?</p>
<p>What about that billboard, it&#8217;s funny and I&#8217;d laugh as I drove by, but is it too much?</p>
<p> <img src="http://www.holycowcreative.org/images/shotglass.jpg" class="right" alt="shot glass" />Or how about a <a href="http://nextlevelchurchnc.blogspot.com/2008/01/give-us-shot.html">shot glass with a church logo</a> on it, is that going to far and giving a green light to the activity?</p>
<p>What about <a href="http://xxxchurch.com/">XXXchurch</a>? They&#8217;ve made a big splash in porn but can they go too far?<img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:UCDdjcT5DUtFHM:http://www.anotherthink.com/my_graphics/JLPS.jpg" class="left" alt="xxx" /></p>
<p>What do you think? How much is too much in bringing originality to the church? Is there such a thing? Can you go too far to reach people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/is-there-such-a-thing-as-going-to-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple doesn&#8217;t steal ideas, they take inspiration</title>
		<link>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/apple-doesnt-steal-ideas-they-take-inspiration/</link>
		<comments>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/apple-doesnt-steal-ideas-they-take-inspiration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckingham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesushatespapyrus.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We who serve the creator should be the most creative. We serve a creative God and I believe He pours creativity into us. And yet instead of setting the pace, the church chases other people&#8217;s ideas. They steal the title of a hot TV show, create a poor rendition of the graphic and call it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>We who serve the creator should be the most creative.</strong></em></p>
<p>We serve a creative God and I believe He pours creativity into us. And yet instead of setting the pace, the church chases other people&#8217;s ideas. They steal the title of a hot TV show, create a poor rendition of the graphic and call it creative. Honestly, it&#8217;s pathetic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard it many times, &#8220;<em>nothing is new</em>&#8220;, but that doesn&#8217;t give license to steal. Instead let it remind you to take ideas, be inspired by them, and create something new. Picasso once said that &#8220;<em>originality lay in having the most obscure sources for your ideas</em>&#8220;&#8230;Here&#8217;s a great example that I wasn&#8217;t aware of until today. The iPod started as a pocket radio, the iMac started as a speaker&#8230;.and they were all <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343641/1960s-braun-products-hold-the-secrets-to-apples-future">inspired by Braun</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/rams-ive.jpg" class="right" alt="apple vs. braun" />The difference between what Apple did and what the church is guilty of is that they didn&#8217;t simply copy the pocket radio, the took inspiration from it and developed something so &#8220;new&#8221; that it changed the way people listen to music. They didn&#8217;t simply copy someone else&#8217;s idea but they brought old ideas together with new ideas to create something remarkable.</p>
<p>So what? Why is this important to you, to the church? Why should you be original? Here are just a few reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Okay, there&#8217;s the obvious: &#8220;Though shall not steal.&#8221; That should really be enough, but let&#8217;s keep going.</li>
<li>When you steal and idea and just return a cheap rendition you look&#8230;cheap. If it&#8217;s not better than the original idea why should anyone pay attention.</li>
<li>Stealing an idea breeds laziness which blinds you to new and more effective ways to communicate.</li>
<li>We are called to excellence&#8230;taking someone elses idea as your own produces lukewarm results.</li>
<li>Your rendition of Desperate Housewives really only impresses yourself and maybe some other churches &#8211; those that you are trying to reach are just not paying attention because there&#8217;s nothing new to pay attention to.</li>
<li>Copying the latest campaign by XYZ Church that worked so well for them? Well, they developed it, researched it &#8230; it may very well not go over in your neighborhood.</li>
<li>There are too many places to go for inspiration. Try the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/cfcc/">Church Markeing Lab</a> or <a href="http://holycowcreative.org/contact.asp">send me a note</a>.</li>
<li>Because original ideas stick.<br />
  </li>
</ul>
<p>When Steve Jobs gets ready to announce the latest Apple products remember everyone is waiting for remarkable ideas and those ideas were created through inspiration.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear from you.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesushatespapyrus.com/originality/apple-doesnt-steal-ideas-they-take-inspiration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.266 seconds -->

